Perbandingan Metode SAW dan Topsis pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Calon Guru di SMA Negeri 16 Medan

Eggy Ryan Agvi Riansyah; Evi Prasetyani; Habibullah; Waisul Kurni; Perani Rosyani

Authors

Eggy Ryan Agvi Riansyah Universitas Pamulang
Evi Prasetyani Universitas Pamulang
Habibullah Universitas Pamulang
Waisul Kurni Universitas Pamulang
Perani Rosyani Universitas Pamulang

Keywords:

SPK, Admission of New Students, Vacational School, Topsis, SAW

Abstract

The idea of decision assistance programs is growing rapidly today. There are many techniques that can help decision making. The TOPSIS and SAW approaches can both be used to address Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM) problems. This is due to the fact that the method is simple, easy to understand, computationally efficient, and capable of calculating the relative performance of decision-alternatives in a straightforward mathematical form. The challenge of this study was to complete a particular MADM example where it might be challenging to choose between the SAW procedure and the TOPSIS method which is more relevant. As a result, a sensitivity test was carried out to identify the best strategy to resolve disputes between SAW and TOPSIS. The purpose of this problem is to assist everyone in making a decision based on the best alternative value. The Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM) problem was solved through the Sensitivity Test technique at first.

References

Hendartie, S. (2017). Analisis Perbandingan Metode SAW dan TOPSIS dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Calon Dosen STMIK Palangkaraya. Jurnal SAINTEKOM, 7(2), 126. https://doi.org/10.33020/saintekom.v7i2.28

Metode SAW Dan Topsis Dalam Pemilihan Tujuan Wisata Di Jawa Barat, P., & Barat, J. (2019). Comparison Between Topsis And SAW Method In The Selection Of Tourist Destinations In West Java Sunarti Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika. Jl. Kamal Raya, 18(1), 76–87.

Mude, M. A. (2016). Perbandingan Metode SAW dan TOPSIS pada kasus UMKM. ILKOM Jurnal Ilmiah, 8(2), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.33096/ilkom.v8i2.49.76-81

Normah, Rifai, B., Vambudi, S., & Maulana, R. (2022). Analisa Sentimen Perkembangan Vtuber Dengan Metode Support Vector Machine Berbasis SMOTE. Jurnal Teknik Komputer AMIK BSI, 8(2), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.31294/jtk.v4i2

Rachmat, A. G., Suprapty, B., & Najib, A. (2019). Perbandingan Metode SAW dan TOPSIS untuk penentuan Dosen Terbaik pada Jurusan Teknologi Informasi Politeknik Negeri Samarinda. Prosiding SAKTI (Seminar Ilmu Komputer Dan Teknologi Informasi), 3(1), 91–97. http://e-journals.unmul.ac.id/index.php/SAKTI/article/view/2073

Sari, W. E., B, M., & Rani, S. (2021). Perbandingan Metode SAW dan Topsis pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerima Beasiswa. Jurnal Sisfokom (Sistem Informasi Dan Komputer), 10(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.32736/sisfokom.v10i1.1027

Supiyan, D. (2019). Perbandingan Metode SAW, WP Dan Topsis Dalam Penentuan Pembiayaan. Jurnal Ilmiah Informatika, 4(2), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.35316/jimi.v4i2.544

Tanu Saputra, G., & Pakereng, M. A. I. (2020). Analisis Perbandingan Metode TOPSIS dan SAW pada Penilaian Karyawan (Studi Kasus : PT Pura Barutama Unit Paper Mill 5, 6, 9). Jurnal Informatika, 7(2), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.31294/ji.v7i2.8612

Wawan Firgiawan, Sugiarto Cokrowibowo, & Nuralamsah Zulkarnaim. (2019). Komparasi Algoritma Saw, Ahp, Dan Topsis Dalam Penentuan Uang Kuliah Tunggal (Ukt). Journal of Computer and Information System ( J-CIS ), 1(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.31605/jcis.v1i2.426

Wiranata, A. D., Irwansyah, I., Budiyantara, A., & Sani, A. (2020). Pemilihan Karyawan Teladan Menggunakan Metode Saw Dan Topsis. JBASE - Journal of Business and Audit Information Systems, 3(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.30813/jbase.v3i1.2060