Perbandingan Metode SAW, WP, Dan TOPSIS Dalam Pemilihan Rumah Kost Mahasiswa Di Pontianak

Authors

  • Shendy Nurhidayat Universitas Pamulang
  • Alfi Maulana Universitas Pamulang
  • Wisnu Gama Kusuma Universitas Pamulang
  • Perani Rosyani Universitas Pamulang

Keywords:

Decision Support, SAW, WP, TOPSIS, Boarding House

Abstract

The number of factors that must be taken into account and considered in making a decision is one of the problems that exist and must be faced by decision makers. This is also the case with students who are going to rent a boarding house. Many factors must be considered and taken into account by students in choosing a boarding house, including the distance from the boarding house to the campus, the distance from the main road to the campus, the size of the room, security, curfew restrictions, rental prices and the type of boarding house. To overcome existing problems, To assist in determining the decision making, a Decision Support System (DSS) approach is used. The criteria used include: location, price, facilities, room size, security. This study aims to analyze the results of the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), Weighted Product (WP) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods so that it can be determined which method is more relevant to be implemented in the case of selecting student boarding houses. This research will discuss the process of selecting student boarding houses by analyzing three methods, namely the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method, the Weighted Product (WP) method and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solutions (TOPSIS method). Although in general the three methods are relatively equally relevant.

References

A. Efendi, “PROGRAM STUDI SISTEM INFORMASI FAKULTAS TEKNIK UNIVERSITAS NUSANTARA PGRI KEDIRI TAHUN 2016”.

A. Dimandili, E. P. Purwandari, and R. Efendi, “PEMILIHAN INDEKOS MAHASISWA DAN PEMETAAN TINGKAT KRIMINALITAS DENGAN PROFILE MATCHING METHOD,” Pseudocode, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 18–28, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.33369/pseudocode.5.1.18-28.

A. Pramudhita, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN RUMAH KOST PUTRA UNTUK MAHASISWA DI KOTA MALANG DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE SAW,” vol. 1, no. 1, 2017.

E. M. Sipayung, C. Fiarni, and S. Sutopo, “Sistem Rekomendasi Tempat Kos di Sekitar Kampus ITHB Menggunakan Metode AHP,” vol. 07, no. 02, 2021.

N. Wardhani, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN TEMPAT KOS UNTUK MAHASISWA DI LUWUK BANGGAI DENGAN METODE SAW (SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING)”.

R. N. Sari and R. S. Hayati, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting Dalam Pemilihan Rumah Kost,” CogITo Smart J., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 215–226, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.31154/cogito.v5i2.217.215-226.

S. M. Akbar and I. G. Anugrah, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUSTUSAN PEMILIHAN TEMPAT KOS UNTUK MAHASISWA DI GRESIK DENGAN METODE SAW (SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING),” vol. 7, no. 2, 2022.

S. Yunita, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Tempat Kost Menggunakan Metode Simple Addtive Weighting (SAW) Kotawaringin Timur”.

Additional Files

Published

05-08-2023

How to Cite

Shendy Nurhidayat, Alfi Maulana, Wisnu Gama Kusuma, & Perani Rosyani. (2023). Perbandingan Metode SAW, WP, Dan TOPSIS Dalam Pemilihan Rumah Kost Mahasiswa Di Pontianak. OKTAL : Jurnal Ilmu Komputer Dan Sains, 2(08), 2176–2186. Retrieved from https://journal.mediapublikasi.id/index.php/oktal/article/view/1573

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>