Perbandingan Metode SAW, WP Dan TOPSIS Dalam Penentuan Guru Berprestasi

Authors

  • Bryan Farriq Reinaldy Universitas Pamulang
  • Hani Sephani Universitas Pamulang
  • Iqbal Ardiansyah Universitas Pamulang
  • Siti Marfirah Universitas Pamulang
  • Perani Rosyani Universitas Pamulang

Keywords:

SAW, WP, TOPSIS, Teacher

Abstract

The determination of outstanding teachers at Mathla'ul Huda Lumpang Private Madrasah Ibtidaiyah has been carried out every year. Determination of outstanding teachers is very important to improve the quality of human resources in the progress of Mathla'ul Huda Lumpang Private Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. In this activity, the determination of outstanding teachers is still considered subjective, because it is only based on personal opinion and not based on certain criteria. The Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method is often known as the weighted sum method. The basic concept of the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method is to find the weighted sum of the performance ratings for each alternative on all attributes. The Weight Product (WP) method is a decision-making method using multiplication to connect criterion values, where the value for each criterion must be raised to the first power of the criterion's weight. Meanwhile, the Technique for Order Performance of Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method uses the principle method that the chosen alternative must have the longest (farthest) distance from the negative ideal solution from a geometric point of view using the relative proximity of the alternatives. The three methods, namely the Order Performance of Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) technique, Weight Product (WP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) can assist in the process of determining which teachers will recommend results based on predetermined main criteria.

References

Kusumantara, P. M., Mukaromah, S., & Putra, A. B. (2022). ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN DEVIASI METODE SAW – WP - TOPSIS PADA SEMBARANG KASUS MADM. 6.

Prihatin, T. (2019). Perbandingan Metode TOPSIS Dan SAW Dalam Penentuan Guru Berprestasi. Jurnal Teknik Komputer, 5(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.31294/jtk.v5i1.4706

Supiyan, D. (2019). PERBANDINGAN METODE SAW, WP DAN TOPSIS DALAM PENENTUAN PEMBIAYAAN BMT EL-RAUSHAN. 4(2), 7.

Syamila, Z. W., Fauziah, F., & Natashia, N. D. (2021). Analisis Pemilihan Marketplace Terbaik pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19 Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),

Technique for Others Reference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) dan Weighted product (WP). Jurnal JTIK (Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi), 5(2), 153. https://doi.org/10.35870/jtik.v5i2.207.

Additional Files

Published

15-06-2023

How to Cite

Bryan Farriq Reinaldy, Hani Sephani, Iqbal Ardiansyah, Siti Marfirah, & Perani Rosyani. (2023). Perbandingan Metode SAW, WP Dan TOPSIS Dalam Penentuan Guru Berprestasi. OKTAL : Jurnal Ilmu Komputer Dan Sains, 2(06), 1543–1551. Retrieved from https://journal.mediapublikasi.id/index.php/oktal/article/view/1413

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>