Penguatan Literasi Digital di Kalangan Remaja
Keywords:
Literasi digital, Dunia maya, Digitalisasi, Keamanan digitalAbstract
Literasi digital merupakan kemampuan penting untuk dikuasai semua orang, terutama bagi mereka yang banyak melakukan aktivitas di dunia maya. Dalam konteks tersebut, artikel ini adalah hasil dari program pengabdian kepada masyarakat dengan tujuan memberikan penguatan literasi digital kepada remaja Karang Taruna Desa Cigasong, Kabupaten Majalengka, Jawa Barat. Dalam pengabdian masyarakat ini, para remaja yang secara umum sudah terbiasa dengan teknologi berbasis internet mendapat beragam materi untuk memperkuat literasi digital mereka di tengah pesatnya digitalisasi. Setelah menerima semua materi, para remaja mampu membedakan konten positif dan negatif serta lebih memahami seputar beragam peluang usaha di dunia maya, pentingnya keamanan digital, dan etika berinternet.
References
Attewell, P. (2001). Comment: The First and Second Digital Divides. Sociology of Education, 74(3), 252-259. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2673277
Blau, I., Shamir-Inbal, T., & Avdiel, O. (2020). How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of students? The Internet and Higher Education, 45, 100722. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100722
Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2012). Thinking in the Digital Era: A Revised Model for Digital Literacy. Issues in Informing Science and Informa-tion Technology, 9(2), 267–276. doi:https://doi.org/10.28945/1621
Eshet-Alkalai, Y., & Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2004). Experiments in Digital Literacy. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 7(4), 421-429. doi:10.1089/cpb.2004.7.421
Fulton, K. (1997). Learning in a digital age: Insights into the issues. A publication of the Milken Exchange on Information Technology: Milken Family Foundation.
Gilster, P. (1997). Digital Literacy. New York: Wiley.
Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills. First Monday, 7(4), 1-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i4.942
Hargittai, E. (2005). Survey Measures of Web-Oriented Digital Literacy. Social Science Computer, 23(3), 371-379. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439305275911
Heitin, L. (2016, 11 8). What Is Digital Literacy? Digital Literacy: An Evolving Definition. Retrieved from Educationweek: https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/what-is-digital-literacy/2016/11
Jewitt, C. (2006). Technology, literacy and learning. A multimodal approach. New Jersey: Routledge.
Korupp, S. E., & Szydlik, M. (2005). Causes and Trends of the Digital Divide. European Sociological Review, 21(4), 409–422. doi:10.1093/esr/jci030
Krumsvik, R. J. (2008). Situated Learning and Teachers’ Digital Competence. Education and Information Technologies, 13(4), 279–290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-008-9069-5
Liu, Z.-J., Tretyakova, N., Fedorov, V., & Kharakhordina, M. (2020). Digital Literacy and Digital Didactics as the Basis for New Learning Models Development. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(14), 4-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i14.14669
Sáinz, M., Castaño, C., & Artal, M. (2008). Review of the concept of digital literacy and its implications on the study of the gender digital divide. UOC, 1-16.
Saripudin, S., Sumarto, S., Juanda, E., Abdullah, A. G., Ana, A., & Ariyanti, T. (2019). Digital Literacy Qualitative Analysis in Vocational Teachers. Proceedings of the 1st Vocational Education International Conference (VEIC 2019) (pp. 262-270). Paris: Atlantis Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.191217.043
Starcic, A. I., Turk, Ž., & Zajc, M. (2015). Transforming Pedagogical Approaches Using Tangible User Interface Enabled Computer Assisted Learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 10(6), 42-52. doi:https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v10i6.4865
Van Dijk, J. (1999). The Network Society: Social Aspects of New. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Van Dijk, J., & Hacker, K. (2003). The Digital Divide as a Complex and Dynamic Phenomenon. The Information Society, 19(4), 315-326. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240309487
