Analisa Perbandingan Metode Saw, Wp Dan Topsis Dalam Menentukan Kandidat Perwakilan Lomba Kompetensi Siswa Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan

Authors

  • Trisna Ayu Silvia Universitas Pamulang
  • Aldiansyah Universitas Pamulang
  • Muhamad Husni Ramadhan Universitas Pamulang
  • Ovi Nur Afifa Universitas Pamulang
  • Perani Rosyani Universitas Pamulang

Abstract

The student competition competition is an annual competition between students at the vocational level depending on the productive skill subjects taught by students at vocational schools, the participants in this LKS competition are in accordance with the OSN (National Science Olympiad) which is held at the junior high/high school level. This Student Competency Competition is important to do because in order to be able to measure the success of the educational process in schools. The decision support system methods used include SAW (Simple Addictive Weighting), WP (Weighted Product) and TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution). These methods are used in order to get accurate results. Calculations using the SAW, WP and TOPSIS methods get different results for the lowest alternative. When using the SAW and WP alternative methods, the highest obtained was Ovi Nur Afifa and the lowest was Aldiansyah. Meanwhile, for the TOPSIS method the lowest is Trisna Ayu Silvia and the highest remains the same. The SAW (Simple Addictive Weighting), WP (Weighted Product) and TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) methods are very appropriate methods for determining candidates in selecting something. Because the calculation results from these methods are very accurate.

References

Fatahillah, A., & Pratama, M. R. (2020). Perbandingan Akurasi Metode TOPSIS dan Metode Weight Product untuk Menentukan Siswa Berprestasi. BIOS: Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Rekayasa Komputer, 1(2), 70-79.

Andika, B., Winata, H., & Ginting, R. I. (2019). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan Duta Sekolah untuk Lomba Kompetensi Siswa Menggunakan Metode Elimination Et Choix Traduisant la Realite (Electre). Jurnal SAINTIKOM (Jurnal Sains Manajemen Informatika Dan Komputer), 18(1), 47-54.

Rahman, M., Na’am, J., & Santony, J. (2019). Pemilihan Peserta Lomba Kompetensi Siswa Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS. UPI YPTK Jurnal KomTekInfo Vol, 5.

Hisyam, Z., & Utomo, P. B. (2019). Analisa Perbandingan Metode Profile Matching Dan Topsis Dalam Pemilihan Ketua OSIS. Jurnal Informa: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 5(4), 60-66.

Prihatin, T. (2019). Perbandingan Metode TOPSIS Dan SAW Dalam Penentuan Guru Berprestasi. Jurnal Teknik Komputer, 5(1), 29-34.

Supiyan, D. (2019). Perbandingan Metode SAW, WP Dan Topsis Dalam Penentuan Pembiayaan. Jurnal Ilmiah Informatika, 4(2), 88-94.

Sunarti, S. (2019). Perbandingan Metode Saw Dan Topsis Dalam Pemilihan Tujuan Wisata Di Jawa Barat. Techno. Com, 18(1), 76-87.

Maesyaroh, S. (2020). Analisis Perbandingan Metode AHP dan TOPSIS Dalam Pemilihan Asisten Laboratorium di FKOM UNIKU. Jurnal Nuansa Informatika, 14(2), 17-30.

Saputra, G. T., & Pakereng, M. A. I. (2020). Analisis Perbandingan Metode TOPSIS dan SAW pada Penilaian

Karyawan (Studi Kasus: PT Pura Barutama Unit Paper Mill 5, 6, 9). Jurnal Informatika, 7(2), 156-165.

Additional Files

Published

30-09-2023

How to Cite

Trisna Ayu Silvia, Aldiansyah, Muhamad Husni Ramadhan, Ovi Nur Afifa, & Perani Rosyani. (2023). Analisa Perbandingan Metode Saw, Wp Dan Topsis Dalam Menentukan Kandidat Perwakilan Lomba Kompetensi Siswa Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. OKTAL : Jurnal Ilmu Komputer Dan Sains, 2(09), 2553–2563. Retrieved from https://journal.mediapublikasi.id/index.php/oktal/article/view/1734